| Indian Historians and Rama! Telling lies from Indraprastha!! | |
| Published on January 10th, 2008 In Uncategorized, Blogging, Careers-Life, Philosophy, Politics | Views 610 <!– by Vedaprakash –> | |
|
Remember these Historians, Indian children Indian History Congress has also played the controversial role of debating the historicity of Rama, as if they are the authority on the subject matter. They asserted that he is ‘not a part of history” but ‘certainly lives in mind and soul”. Without history or past-knowledge, how such thing could live in mind and soul? Ironically, they did not confess whether he “lives in mind and soul”! ‘Ram is not a historical figure. We don”t find proof of his existence in the pages of history. But let me clarify, he is in the minds and souls of millions of people,” said eminent historian Ram Sharan Sharma. Note the irony!! If he tells a like this, then, which history he is referring to has to be noted and checked. R. S. Sharma or Ram Sharan Sharma has been an old senile man like M. Karunanidhi who starts talking irrelevant things incoherently. * The Constitutional writers had been idiots enough to decorate the pages with the unhistorical figures. * They can recommend to remove such drawings from the Constitution or the Constitution itself can be declared unhistorical! Sharma, who has written 115 books, said: ‘Let”s not fight in the name of Lord Ram. He is simply beyond history.” * But has he written those books on Rama or Ravana? * He should have analyzed historically about Rama also. * He RAM – HE RAM SHARAN SHARMA!!! Baba Mishra, a leading historian from Orissa, said that not only the pages of history but recent archaeological excavation in several places have not found traces of Lord Ram. ‘No, We don”t find any historicity of Ram. As a Hindu, I will continue to worship Lord Ram but when it comes to finding his historical existence, I will go by fact,” Mishra, a professor at Sambalpur University. * How could then H. D. Sankalia have written in his book that the core story of Ramayana was known at least by 1500 BCE? * Were the people have been fiools to carry over such history for more than 3500 years? * Can these 50-70 aged historians with their limited historical knowledge and available evidences could decide about such 3500 YBP history? * What guts they have? ‘Excavation in Ayodhya, Nadigram and Shrungabirpur (all in Uttar Pradesh) has not found any trace of Lord Ram”s existence. As historians, we should not be biased – let”s keep our personal belief and fact separate,” he added. * So this clearly proves that he is telling lies. H. D.Sankalia noted that even Asoka, Chandragupta Maurya and others have no such archaeological evidences, as no horizontal excavations were done at their respective places. Thus, he opined, unless horizontal excavations were done, nothing could be decided archaeologically. * How then, this man decides without any archaeological excavation, but in the name of archaeology? Then they came to the Ram Setu controversy discovering that it has its root in vote bank politics. They believe that like Ram, Ram Setu is not a man made structure. * Note the nonsense of historians, they believe! * Why they should believe? * Can their beliwef have any authority? * How long they have been believing like this? * May be 2 – 3 months, one year? But what about the 3500 YBP belief? * Why such historical belief of 3500 YBP should be ignored by the learned historians for the sake of their belief of days and months? G.J. Sudhakar, a historian from Chennai said: ‘Neither was Ram a human being nor was Ram Setu man made. Let”s not debate the historicity of Ram. I believe in Ram, and millions believe in him. Let Ram remain our faith and belief.” ‘I think, Hindus will continue to worship him but he will not find a place in the pages of history,” said Sudhakar, a history professor at Loyola College, Chennai. * Oh this guy talks differently at different places on Ram Sethu. Kindly note his assertions on NDTV etc. During TNHC, he was keeping quite without opening his mouth, when Archaeologist Ponnuswamy protested against these men on the stage at Chennai on December session held just two weeks back. * Nowadays, G. J. sudhakar has become a great liar by being a historian. Perhaps, he wants to be the greatest liar among the liars of Indian historians!! D.N. Roy, a professor of history at Bhagalpur University in Bihar, said politicians remember Lord Ram only before election. * OK, what about you – historians? * You remember immediately, when they start remembering RAM? * What is and why this coincidence? ‘Opposing or favouring Lord Ram is a political move of all politicians. All political parties have been successful in politicising our belief and thus want to get political mileage out of it,” Roy said. ‘It”s unfortunate that our politicians are dragging our belief, faith in the name of history. Let”s keep both things separate for the betterment of our younger children and next generation,” he said. * But, Mr. Roy, you are also committing the same blunder telling lies to Indian children. * Indian children cannot forget your lies proounede from Indraprastha! * They shall remember for ever. * Of course, all Indians and Hindus (ironically, the / some historians theselves accept that they are Hindus) should note and remember these historical liars and history-liars. They may change colours if government changes. * If BJP comes to power these guys may go after like M. G. S. Narayanan etc. singing and praising Rama or denouncing AIT! N.R. Jena, another historian from Orissa and Ashok Kumar Singh from Uttar Pradesh believe that government may evaluate environmental impact before dredging Ram Setu. ‘If it will bring more economic benefit then government may go for it but they should not do this without assessing other things like historical and religious impacts,” Singh said. VEDAPRAKASH 10-01-2008 |
|
குறிச்சொற்கள்: atheism, historiography, history, ramayana
சரித்திர வரைவியல் 
பின்னூட்டமொன்றை இடுக